Learning Goals
- Develop knowledge of biological and cultural factors shaping human biological variation
- Build effective scientific communication skills
- Critically evaluate and challenge harmful social discourse about human biological variation
The Assignment
Students created a GenAI persona (via a custom system prompt) that held a specific misconception about human biological variation. They then engaged with the persona in conversation, correcting the misconception using course readings and evidence. Students submitted their system prompt, full transcript, and a written reflection.
Class time was dedicated to scaffolding: students learned to write system prompts, tested multiple models, and selected the best fit before completing the week-long assignment independently.
What Worked
- Simulating real dialogue with someone holding a misconception—safely and without discomfort
- Pushed students to demonstrate mastery by constructing persuasive, evidence-based arguments
- Introduced students to a genuinely new use of AI (system prompts, persona design)
- Clear AI use policies reduced ambiguity and student anxiety
Student Survey Results
21 of 22 enrolled students responded (95% response rate). Items rated on a 1-5 Likert scale.
hernandez_anthroaiassignment_studentresponses.png
Student Voices
"It allowed me to practice my dialogue skills without feeling unsafe—there was no physical threat."
"It showed me a completely new way to use or think about AI. I feel like it was a valuable assignment overall."
Faculty Reflections: Building on What Worked
- Increase AI persona complexity to better challenge advanced students
- Offer more explicit onboarding to Dartmouth Chat for students unfamiliar with LLM differences
- Consider multi-model comparisons as an extension activity
- Reinforce AI literacy (model selection, web retrieval) as foundational scaffolding